Know what QA really costs.
The testing budget is only part of it. Add the engineering time, waiting and rework to see the full picture.
Your team, your numbers.
Start with your setup. Adjust as you go.Estimated total annual QA cost
per year · conservative assumptionsEstimates use your inputs and adjustable cost assumptions. Regional salaries and currency rates are fixed reference values; results are not a savings guarantee.
Adjust and see the working
Process and assumptions.
Context switching: 10% of QA time. Waiting on QA: 8% of engineering payroll when internal or outsourced QA is present. Rework effort: 1.0×. Release delay: 5% of engineering payroll, multiplied by 1.5 with outsourced QA.
Production incident exposure.
An annualised estimate of the cost of defects reaching production. This is kept separate from your QA total.
Where the money goes.
How the estimate is calculated
QA budget. Internal QA headcount × loaded annual salary, plus monthly outsourced spend × 12.
Engineering time. Engineering payroll × the share of time on QA. Rework is modelled as payroll × the share of releases needing rework × the selected effort multiplier.
Overhead. Context switching applies to QA labour; waiting and release delay apply to engineering payroll using the selected assumptions. These are modelled costs and may overlap in your own accounting.
Regional defaults. Salary starting points are from Antidote’s May 2026 market workbook. They are editable assumptions, not live salary data.
Currency. GBP is the model’s base currency. Fixed reference rates from 3 Aug 2026: £1 = $1.3483 = €1.1688. Switching currency converts both inputs and outputs.
Scope. This estimates your current QA costs. It does not predict savings or quote Antidote pricing. Production incident exposure is calculated separately.
Start with one journey.
Pick the flow that costs you most when it breaks. We agree the targets up front. You judge the result.